
Read Past
Interviews
Jeanne
Cavelos is a writer, editor, scientist, teacher,
and lately, radio host. Her career began as an astrophysicist
and mathematician, teaching astronomy at Michigan State University
and Cornell University, and working in the Astronaut Training
Division at NASA's Johnson Space Center.
After earning my MFA in creative writing, she
became a senior editor at Bantam Doubleday Dell, and launched
the Abyss imprint of psychological horror, for which she won the
World Fantasy Award. While in publishing, she worked with such
authors as William
F. Nolan, Robert
Anton Wilson, Dennis
Etchison, Joan
Vinge, Tanith
Lee, Kathe
Koja, Poppy
Z. Brite, J.M.
Dillard, David
Wingrove, Barry
Gifford, Patrick
McCabe, Syd Field,
Phil Farrand, and Peter
Dickinson.
In 1994, she left New York to pursue her writing career. Her latest
book, Invoking
Darkness, is the third volume in the best-selling The Passing
of the Techno-Mages, a trilogy set in the Babylon 5 universe (Del
Rey). Also available is her nonfiction book, 'The
Science of Star Wars' (St. Martin's) and 'The
Science of The X-Files' (Berkley).
Other works include a novella, "Negative
Space" (which was given honorable mention in The Year's Best
Science Fiction), in the anthology Decalog 5: Wonders (Virgin
Publishing) and an essay, "Innovation in Horror," which
appears in both Writing Horror: A Handbook by the Horror Writers
Association and The Complete Handbook of Novel Writing (Writer's
Digest Books). I also put together my first anthology, The
Many Faces of Van Helsing, which was published by Berkley
in 2004. If you're interested in reading the submission guidelines
for this anthology, you
can find them here.
In 1996, she created Odyssey,
an annual six-week summer writing workshop for writers of fantasy,
science fiction, and horror in New Hamshire. Odyssey is a place
where developing writers can focus on their craft and receive
detailed, in-depth feedback on their work. Guest lecturers have
included George
R. R. Martin, Harlan
Ellison, Terry
Brooks, Ben
Bova, Jane
Yolen, and Dan Simmons.
Jeanne has lectured at venues as varied as
the Smithsonian Institute, the United States Air Force Revolutionary
Technologies Division, the American Chemical Society, Dartmouth
College, the Intel International Science Fair, the Discovery Channel,
the Sci-Fi Channel, the History Channel, Turner Entertainment,
the Art Bell radio program, and many others.
What are you working on right now?
I'm in the middle of writing a near-future
thriller about cloning and genetic manipulation, called FATAL
SPIRAL. It's part science fiction, part horror. My idea is to
attempt to take one of the classics of our genre, FRANKENSTEIN,
and flip it upside down. I feel that's an important story that's
really never been told. In stories about scientists trying to
manipulate or alter life, it seems their alterations are always
bad and lead to the creation of monsters. I don't think that's
necessarily so. I think humans can be pretty horrible and monstrous
on their own. But this is a tough story to tell, so I've already
been at work on it for several years, and I probably have another
year or two to go before it's done.
I'm also writing a chapter for a book of essays
on the TV series FARSCAPE,
which will be published by BenBella
Books. I'm a huge fan of the series. I'm analyzing FARSCAPE's
plots, which often felt like they'd been phoned in from the insane
asylum. The series had very little exposition; hardly ever would
you hear a character explaining something. Usually the characters
didn't understand what was going on themselves, and when they
did, they often didn't care. The writers just threw us into a
situation, escalated the problems like crazy, and left us to figure
it out. I think that studying these plots can be very helpful
to writers. They are not the standard SF fare.
You just picked up a gig as a co-host on a
Sci-fi/horror radio program. Tell us a little bit about the program
and what you hope to accomplish?
SCI-FI
SATURDAY NIGHT is a weekly radio program running from 6:00
- 9:00 PM on the AM stations WGIR, WGIN, and WGIP in New Hampshire.
Some areas in Massachusetts and Maine can also pick up the program.
Our first show was Jan. 29, so this is all very new. With my two
co-hosts, Mr. K and the Dome, and various guests, we discuss what's
new in science fiction, horror, and fantasy--books, movies, DVDs,
comics, games--and new discoveries in science. I hope that we'll
be able to highlight some high-quality SF/H/F, educate casual
fans about the field, feature great books and great authors, and
build the genre community. The show is not yet available for streaming
on the Internet; that may come in the spring. You can get more
information at www.wgiram.com/scifi.html
What can you tell us about Odyssey 2005? As
the director of the event since 1996, how does Odyssey stand out
from other writing workshops?
Odyssey
is a six-week summer workshop for writers of horror, fantasy,
and science fiction. This year's workshop runs from June 13 -
July 22 and will be held at Saint
Anselm College in Manchester, NH. Developing writers whose
work is approaching publication quality apply from all over the
world. The application deadline is April 15. This will be a great
year for horror writers to attend, since our writers-in-residence
are Melanie
Tem and Steve Rasnic Tem. Guest lecturers include Elizabeth
Hand, James
Morrow, Allen
Steele, Sheila
Williams, and P. D. Cacek.
I started Odyssey in 1996 for two main reasons.
I had just left my position as senior editor at Bantam Doubleday
Dell to focus on my own writing. My job had become so time-consuming
that I had no time to write. Yet I loved working with other authors,
helping them to improve their work. So I wanted to create a place
where I could interact with authors and provide them in-depth
feedback and guidance. My second reason for creating Odyssey was
my own experience getting a master's degree in creative writing.
My teachers didn't read SF/F/H or know much of anything about
it, so the degree to which they could help me was limited. And
I've heard horror stories from many other creative writing students
who haven't even been allowed to turn in genre stories to class.
I wanted to create the equivalent of a master's-level writing
workshop that focused on genre fiction, where all the teachers
and students knew and loved the genres, and could tell students
how their work stacked up in the field.
Odyssey is structured unlike any other workshop
I know. I'm the primary instructor for the six weeks, teaching
students about all the major elements of fiction, critiquing a
large amount of their work, charting their progress, and guiding
them in private meetings through the various challenges they face
in their writing. This continuity of feedback from me is mixed
with input from various guest writers and editors. A guest lecturer
comes in for a 24-hour period each week, offering his own insights
into the writing process and giving students feedback on their
work. The writers-in-residence come for an entire week, so students
get to work more intensively with them. This combination seems
to work very well in offering students a variety of viewpoints
and yet also consistent guidance from someone who has read a lot
of their work.
Odyssey is also the only workshop of its kind
run by an editor, which I think gives the program a different
perspective. I don't tell students to write the way I write. I
know, from working with many authors, that each one has a different
process. So my goal is to help each student find the best process
for him.
We also allow students to work on novels at
the workshop, which many other workshops don't allow. And we've
had a very high success rate, with 40% of graduates going on to
be professionally published. You can find out more at www.sff.net/odyssey.
How is your approach to writing horror fiction
different from other genres?
I don't really think it's that different, but
much of my horror is mixed with SF. When I'm writing a story that's
purely horror, or a scene in an SF/H story that's supposed to
evoke strong fear or horror, I generally describe much more, slowing
down the action to increase the reader's apprehension and to make
the situation more vivid, intense, and inescapable. One of my
favorite examples of this kind of writing is the staircase scene
in Stephen King's THE SHINING. The way he manipulates the pace
in that scene is completely brilliant. When Jack Torrence brings
the roque mallet down, it's fast and unstoppable. When the roque
mallet hits Wendy, her reaction and her pain are slow and drawn
out.
How did you get involved in writing media tie-in
books for Babylon 5? From your perspective, how is the process
for writing a media tie-in different from writing an original
work?
I never planned to write media tie-ins. I got
involved through a strange sequence of circumstances. I was working
at Bantam Doubleday Dell when Babylon 5 first aired. I was very
excited about the promise of the show, and the idea that the creator,
Joe Straczynski, was in essence writing a five-year-long TV novel.
I contacted Joe and told him we'd be interested in publishing
some B5 novels. He liked the idea, so we moved ahead. Several
years later, I left to pursue my own writing career. I had a half-finished
novel that I was determined to complete. Bantam Doubleday Dell
asked me to continue editing the B5 books as a freelancer, and
I agreed. In one of my conversations with Warner Brothers, the
B5 studio, the publishing liaison said she wished I would write
a B5 novel for them. She thought I would do a great job. I told
her I wasn't interested, but the seed had been planted, and I
found myself thinking about what sort of B5 novel I would write,
if I ever wrote one. I got very excited about a particular idea,
wrote a proposal, and sent it in. They liked it, and that turned
into THE SHADOW
WITHIN.
I grew up reading and loving tie-ins, such
as the James Blish STAR TREK novels, and so I take writing tie-ins
very seriously. I feel they can be great art just as an episode
of a TV series can be great art, and I do my best to create something
of as high a quality as I can. Approaching it that way, writing
a novel set in someone else's universe can be very challenging.
I think it really depends a lot on the specific universe and the
circumstances. Since B5 was a continuing story, with many complex
story threads, it was difficult to write a story consistent with
all of these. I wrote THE SHADOW WITHIN while the series was still
on the air, and new revelations were coming to light each week.
Authors of the novels received very little information about what
was coming up, so that future storylines weren't leaked. At one
point, near my due date, I had people in England sending me videotapes
of episodes that had aired there, but not yet here.
Tie-in authors have to do research just like
regular authors, but the research involves watching episodes over
and over, noting not only the plots, but also details of setting,
character gestures, intonations. You also have the challenge of
trying to reconcile any inconsistencies you find, or make sense
of things in that universe that don't seem to make sense. You
are, in a sense, creating a puzzle piece for a puzzle that is
otherwise complete. Yours has to fit into the outline that has
been created, and the colors have to generally go with the surrounding
colors. If you love the show, the way I loved B5, the task is
a joy.
Which writers (genre or otherwise) influence
or inspire you? Why?
I love a lot of the older writers -- Wells,
Lovecraft, Aeschylus, Tolkien, Kafka, Conrad, Poe.
Of more contemporary writers, I find reading
the works of Ian
McEwan, Stephen
King, Ursula
Le Guin, Arthur
C. Clarke very inspiring.
I love to find one short story or one scene
that I really love and then read it about twenty times and study
it, figuring out what makes it so great.
Tell us a little bit about your writing process.
What's your schedule? Do you outline your stories? How do you
edit / revise your stories?
I have five jobs these days--writing, freelance
editing, teaching, running Odyssey, and co-hosting the radio show.
So the number of hours I spend on each varies as deadlines come
and particular tasks demand my time. In general, I try very hard
to write each day. I've found that if I skip days, then weeks
and months often go by before I'm able to get back to it. I spend
about three hours a day working on my novel, and right now I'm
spending about three hours a day working on the FARSCAPE essay.
When I get that done, I'll go back to spending six hours a day
on the novel. I spend about three hours a day editing, and then
additional hours doing email, planning for this summer's Odyssey,
and preparing for the radio show. I usually work about twelve
hours, six days a week, and then about six hours on the seventh
day.
I'm a great believer in outlining, and I write
long outlines for all my books (I even outline my short stories).
This doesn't mean I always follow the outline. I don't see the
outline as some ball and chain constraining my creativity. I think
it's a snapshot of my thoughts about the book at a particular
point, and I can change it constantly or throw it out, as best
serves the book. On my current book, I've now thrown the 90-page
outline out the window. But I feel I've come to know the characters
and the situation well enough that I know what I'm doing without
it.
What are the most positive trends in genre
fiction / publishing today?
The rise of the small press allows many books
that wouldn't otherwise be published to be made available to readers.
Internet booksellers like Amazon
also allow smaller books and older books to retain visibility
and availability.
Passionate editors continue to be a strength
in our field. People who believe in SF/F/H and love it are always
good to have in positions of power, and despite the mergers and
conglomerates, we continue to have passionate editors who are
willing to fight for books they believe in.
What are the most negative trends in genre
fiction / publishing today?
While many great editors remain in the field,
some editors don't have time to edit these days, or don't have
the inclination, since editing skills in and of themselves are
not highly valued in publishing. I don't know any editor who has
received a promotion because they did a really good editing job
on a manuscript. My own books, for the most part, have been very
lightly edited, and while I'd like to think that's because I'm
brilliant, I think the real reason is that the editor didn't spend
a lot of time on the manuscript.
I could complain about the proliferation of
series books, derivative books, doorstop fantasies, and so on,
but hey -- that's life. Publishers jump on the bandwagon of whatever's
hot.
Feel free to add any closing comments of your
own.
I think I've probably gone on too long already
. . .
Posted 02.04.05 |